Sell Land to a Developer
If you own land in Chicago — or a property with redevelopment potential — its value to a developer may be very different from what a traditional residential buyer would pay.
Developers evaluate land based on future build potential, not just current condition. Zoning, density, unit count, mixed-use flexibility, and projected rents all factor into pricing.
Point B Properties acquires land and redevelopment sites for 2–80 unit multifamily and mixed-use projects across Chicago. We underwrite based on:
- Zoning and allowable density
- Unit count potential
- NOI projections (for income properties)
- Construction cost feasibility
- Retail viability (if mixed-use)
- Timeline and entitlement risk
If you’re considering selling land to a developer, here’s what you should know.
How Much Will a Developer Pay for My Land?
The short answer: it depends on what can be built.
Developers do not price land based on comparable home sales. Instead, we calculate land value using a residual land value approach:
Projected finished value
minus construction costs
minus soft costs
minus financing
minus required profit margin
= Maximum land price
For example:
If a 20-unit building could be built and stabilized at a projected value of $6,000,000, and total development cost is $4,800,000, the remaining $1,200,000 represents the maximum allowable land value (before adjusting for risk).
This is why some lots sell for far more than neighboring properties — density drives value.
Key factors that affect what a developer will pay:
- Zoning classification (B1, B2, RM, etc.)
- Lot size and frontage
- Transit proximity
- Ability to build 3+ stories
- Parking requirements
- Retail demand (for mixed-use corridors)
- Existing tenants or demolition costs
If your property currently has a small structure but zoning allows greater density, it may be worth more to a developer than to a homeowner.
👉 For buildings with 2–80 units, see our
Chicago Multifamily Valuation Guide
(/how-much-is-my-property-worth-to-a-developer-a-complete-guide-for-2026/)
Benefits of Selling to a Developer (vs. Traditional Listing)
Selling land or redevelopment property through a broker is one option. Selling directly to a developer is another.
Here are the practical differences:
1. Pricing Based on Potential, Not Cosmetics
A retail buyer evaluates finishes.
A developer evaluates zoning and density.
If your land supports additional units or mixed-use redevelopment, that upside may not be captured in a standard MLS listing.
2. As-Is Purchase
Developers typically purchase:
- Vacant land
- Obsolete structures
- Tenant-occupied buildings
- Buildings with violations
- Mixed-use assets with underperforming retail
You don’t need to renovate or reposition before selling.
3. Fewer Showings, Less Disruption
No open houses.
No constant tours.
No waiting for retail mortgage approval.
For multifamily sellers, this means less disruption to tenants.
4. Faster, More Certain Close
Traditional listings depend on:
- Buyer financing
- Appraisals
- Retail underwriting
Developer purchases are underwritten differently and often close with fewer contingencies.
5. Off-Market Confidentiality
Some sellers prefer not to publicly list redevelopment sites. Direct-to-developer sales can be structured quietly.
For owners of 5–80 unit buildings or mixed-use properties, see:
/sell-multifamily-chicago/
Should I Sell to a Developer or List Traditionally?
This depends on three variables:
1. Is Your Property Primarily a “Home” or a “Development Site”?
If your property’s highest value comes from density or redevelopment, a developer may be the natural buyer.
If it’s primarily a finished residential home in turnkey condition, retail listing may yield higher pricing.
2. Timeline
If you need:
- Speed
- Certainty
- As-is sale
Developer sales often make sense.
If you have:
- No time pressure
- Ability to stage/prepare
- Desire to maximize retail exposure
Listing may be appropriate.
3. Risk Tolerance
Developer pricing accounts for risk:
- Zoning uncertainty
- Construction cost volatility
- Market shifts
Some sellers prefer accepting a clean offer rather than gambling on peak market timing.
At Point B, we will tell you directly whether your property is better suited for:
- Developer acquisition
- Retail listing
- Or repositioning before sale
If it’s not a fit for us, we’ll say so.
👉 You can also review how we value multifamily buildings here:
/what-is-my-apartment-building-worth-in-todays-market/
FAQ — Selling Land to a Developer in Chicago
How much will a developer pay for land?
Developers calculate land value using residual land value — the projected finished value of a development minus total costs and required profit margin. Zoning and density are the largest drivers.
Do developers pay more than market value?
Sometimes. If zoning allows higher density than comparable home sales reflect, developer pricing may exceed traditional residential market pricing.
How do developers calculate property value?
For land: residual land value.
For 5+ unit buildings: NOI and cap rate analysis.
For mixed-use: blended residential + retail underwriting.
Is selling to a developer better than listing?
It depends on condition, zoning potential, timeline, and risk tolerance. Developer sales prioritize speed and feasibility over retail staging.
What types of buildings do developers buy?
We evaluate:
- Vacant land
- 2–80 unit multifamily
- Mixed-use buildings
- Church or adaptive reuse sites
- Obsolete commercial structures
Do developers buy mixed-use buildings?
Yes. Especially corridor retail with residential above, where density or repositioning potential exists.
Can I sell a 10–20 unit building directly to a developer?
Yes. Many multifamily owners sell directly to developers for faster closings and fewer contingencies.
Closing Section
Considering Selling Land or a Redevelopment Property in Chicago?
If your property has development potential, the only way to know its true value is through feasibility underwriting — not just comparable sales.
We evaluate:
- 2–80 unit redevelopment opportunities
- Transit-adjacent density
- Mixed-use corridors
- Adaptive reuse opportunities
No obligation. No pressure.